Chargement de la vidéo...


Distributed under a Creative Commons Paternité - Pas d'utilisation commerciale - Pas de modification 4.0 International License


Intégrer la vidéo


Consultations de la notice


Téléchargements de fichiers



AAR Campus Archives Audiovisuelles de la Recherche (Campus AAR) est une plateforme communautaire destinée à l'analyse, la documentation la mise en valeur, et la publication de corpus audiovisuels numériques archivés sur MédiHal.

The International Communication of Great Apes.
Origins of Human Communication.


Description : Lecture 1. The Intentional Communication of Great Apes
Ape gestural communication flexible, intentional, but not co-operative (no shared intentionality).

Biol. comm. = any physical or behavioral feature that evolved to influence others Need equilibrium of costs & benefits for Comm. (C) & Audience (A) EG: angler fish, duck mating displays Communicator = behavioral manipulation <=> Audience = information

1.1. Great Apes' Vocalizations and Gestures
Displays = genetically fixed <=> Signals = flexible, voluntary Vocalizations = displays Unlearned & inflexibly used no indiv diff; isolation exps; cross- fostering exps inflexibly used: particular situations and emotions do not learn new vocalizations (even w/ with humans) Goodall: "The production of a sound in the absence of the appropriate emotional state seems to be an almost impossible task for a chimpanzee" Broadcast to all: audience effects = presence/absence of kin (at best) e.g., call even when whole group is there (predator, food) Evolutionarily urgent functions ==> high emotions e.g., vervet alarm calls: [apes = no referentially specific calls] A = extract information (learn bird alarms) C = cause behavior: predator retreats; kin run to safety Seyfarth & Cheney (2003, p. 168): "Listeners acquire information from signalers who do not, in the human sense, intend to provide it." Vocal comm. basically same in all mammals (ground squirrels, dolphins) Gestures = signals Many genetically fixed postures & facial expressions But some: less evolutionarily urgent functions ==> relaxed emotions e.g., play, riding, nursing, begging, grooming Flexible Use [analogy: tool use] learned: individual differences; novel (idiosyncratic) gestures, new gestures with humans (see below) flexibly used: means-ends dissociation combinations/sequences ontogenetic ritualization, not imitation sequence: (i) C does X; (ii) A anticipates by doing Y at int. move.; (iii) C notices this, and just produces int. move. evidence: group comparisons; experiment no imitation: gestures = one-way, not shared (¿convention?) Attention to the attention of the partner Directed at individual recipients (not broadcast) much evidence: visual gestures only when A attending Visual modality: focus on attentional state of partner A: is it directed to me? C: Is she attending? Type I: Intention movements: und. others' goals e.g., arm-raise, touch-side: I want you to do X. imperative, dyadic (food-beg as exception; object 'offer') metonymic (no iconic) => function/meaning internal to activity supposed gorilla examples of iconic Type II: Attention getters: und. others' perception to obtain attention on displays: I want you to see me [do X] e.g., leaf clipping (erection), throw stuff (play face) function/meaning from display chimp and gorilla examples of hiding displays auditory attention getters: only African apes make noise without emotion to obtain attention to body part or object: groom, play, food I want you to see: ¿Gricean claim of attention? apes do not produce sequence: att-getter + intention-movement walk around (observations, experiment): esp. Pan Comparison: ape gestures more cognitively sophisticated (closer to language) than vocalizations => based on und. that others have goals & perceptions Learned, flexible, novel, creative combinations (vocal = no) Chosen w/r/t attentional state of the recipient (vocal = no) and use of attention getters, walking around More sophisticated in apes than in monkeys (vocal = opposite) But not conventions => not shared, only one-way (not imitated) But no pointing or iconic gestures: not even when want something Not collaborative (no requests for clarification)

1.2. Great Apes and Pointing
Approx. 60-70% of captive chimps point imperatively for humans to out-of-reach food, w/ persistence, when human looking - nothing systematic w/ vocalizations (auditory att-getters: yes) point to tool, so humans can use it to get them food [C&T, '94] so human can use it for self? (so far = no) point to where food was hidden many hours before Kanzi combines pointing with lexigram to specify who others: bring human to place where she can help; give human locked box for help; put human's hand on pocket => analogy = tool-use no declarative (sharing) pointing; no informative (helping) pointing no characterizing gestures; but can be taught ASL signs = imperative ¿What are these points? And why for humans, but not for conspecifics? conspecifics competitive <=> humans helpful human evol.: imperative pointing when others become helpful Comprehending pointing Apes can follow gaze or pointing gesture to, e.g., food (no inference) But apes terrible in object choice, w/ food hidden; Why? kids good at 12-14 mos. Hare & T competitive object choice experiment und. goal & perceptions of other (in competition) make inference about goal of reaching Herrmann & T => "Don't!" experiment => inference from prohibition ¿ und. indiv. imperatives? Next Lecture: not missing und. of intentionality [goal, percept, act] but missing shared intentionality: joint attention, communicative intention (relevance to JAF), cooperative motive to share info. Sidebar on domestic dogs (and foxes) => skills in obj choice wolves, undom. foxes => no skills Rico 'words': frame is always "Fetch!" (natural + trained) - new experiment w/icons

1.3. Summary: Ape Gestural Communication
Ape gestures => intentional communication: (i) flexible, (ii) audience design Based on und. goals & perceptions of others (vocal. = no!) Intention movements - function/meaning inherent if und. goals Attention getters - function/meaning inherent if und. displays (+percept) But not co-operative comm. b/c no skills & motivations of shared intentionality Gestures one-way (not imitated), not collab. (no reqs. for clarification) Helpful partner leads apes to indiv. imperatives, but not co-op. comm.

Some References
Call, J. & Tomasello, M. (1994). The production and comprehension of referential pointing by orangutans. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 108, 307-317 Call, J. & Tomasello, M. (Eds). (in press). The gestural communication of apes and monkeys. Erlbaum. Call, J. & Tomasello, M. (1996). The effect of humans on the cognitive development of apes. In A. Russon, K.A. Bard, S.T. Parker (Eds.), Reaching into Thought: The Minds of the Great Apes. Cambridge U Press. Hare, B., Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (in press). Chimpanzees deceive a human by hiding. Cognition Hare, B. & Tomasello, M. (2004). Chimpanzees are more skillful in competitive than in cooperative cognitive tasks. Animal Behaviour, 68, 571-81 Hare, B., Brown, M., Williamson, C., & Tomasello, M. (2002). The domestication of social cognition in dogs. Science, 298, 1634-36. Hermann, E. & Tomasello, M. (in press). Apes' and children's understanding of cooperative and competitive motives in a communicative situation. Developmental Science. Liebal, K. , Pika, S. & Tomasello, M. (2006). Gestural communication in orangutans. Gesture, 6, 1 - 38. Liebal, K., Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2004). The use of gesture sequences by chimpanzees. American Journal of Primatology, 64, 377-396. Liebal, K., Pika, S., Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2004). To move or not to move: How apes adjust to the attentional state of others. Interaction Studies, 5, 199-219 Pika, S. , Liebal, K., & Tomasello, M. (2003). Gestural communication in gorillas. American Journal of Primatology, 60, 95-111. Pika, S. , Liebal, K., & Tomasello, M. (2005). Gestural communication in bonobos. American Journal of Primatology, 65, 39-61. Pika, S. , Liebal, K., Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2005). Gestural communication of apes. Gesture, 5, 41 - 56. Tomasello, M. (1996). Do apes ape? In J. Galef & C. Heyes (Eds.), Social Learning in Animals: The Roots of Culture. Academic Press Tomasello, M. & Call, J. (1997). Primate Cognition. Oxford University Press. Tomasello, M. & Camaioni, L. (1997). A comparison of the gestural communication of apes and human infants. Human Development, 40, 7-24. Tomasello, M. (in press). Why don't apes point? N. Enfield & S. Levinson (Eds.), Roots of Human Sociality. Wenner-Grenn. Tomasello, M., Call, J., & Gluckman, A. (1997). The comprehension of novel communicative signs by apes and human children. Child Development, 68, 1067-1081. Tomasello, M., Call, J., Nagell, K., Olguin, R., & Carpenter, M. (1994). The learning and use of gestural signals by young chimpanzees: A trans-generational study. Primates, 37, 137-154. Tomasello, M., Call, J., Warren, J., Frost, T., Carpenter, M., & Nagell, K. (1997). The ontogeny of chimpanzee gestural signals: A comparison across groups and generations. Evolution of Communication. 1, 223-253. Tomasello, M., Call, J., & Hare, B. (2003). Chimpanzees understand psychological states: The question is which ones and to what extent. Trends in Cognitive Science, 7, 153-156 Tomasello, M & Zuberbüler, K. (2002). Primate vocal and gestural communication. In M. Bekoff, C. Allen, & G. Burghardt (Eds), The Cognitive Animal: Empirical and Theoretical Perspecitives on Animal Cognition. MIT Press.
Contributeur : Peter Stockinger <>
Soumis le : dimanche 10 décembre 2017 - 19:39:14
Dernière modification le : mardi 23 janvier 2018 - 18:54:44